Greater Boston Anti-Racism Media Watch

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

"A 'Smoking Gun' on Race, subprime loans" (03/17/07) -- Boston Globe asks "Why?" and gives an unconsciously racist answer.

In this article, Kimberly Blanton, Globe staff, writes that “…it is well known that subprime loans are prevalent in minority communities in Boston and surrounding communities. What is much less clear is why.” She gives the following reasons: “…blacks and Latinos have lower incomes, on average, and fewer assets such as savings, investments, and real estate…lack of a down payment is the biggest issue for the black community. Black households…have accumulated one-tenth the wealth available to white households.” Blanton explains this racial wealth disparity by quoting Tom Shapiro, a Brandeis University sociology professor who says “blacks are more likely the first generation to attend college or get a professional job. Blacks and Latinos also earn about half as much as whites in Massachusetts…” Readers are led to believe that lack of college education explains why Blacks have accumulated one tenth the wealth of whites and thus must resort to subprime loans if they are to purchase homes.

Lack of college education leading to low paying jobs is indeed a contributing factor to the racial wealth gap. However, offering this fact as the sole explanation is misleading, unconsciously racist, and damaging to all of us. If we look at the history of the racial wealth gap, which this article fails to do, we see that the root causes of this disparity lie clearly with white institutions. Between 1934 and 1968, the Federal Housing Administration gave 120 billion dollars in loans for home ownership, 98% of which went to whites. Blatantly discriminatory policies gave whites the opportunity to build wealth through home equity while making it very difficult if not impossible for people of color to purchase their own homes. This has been a major factor creating today’s wealth gap of $116,000 between white and black families. Further, because property taxes support public education, these policies have also contributed to the disparities in the resources and thus the quality of schools between white neighborhoods and urban neighborhoods of color (see The Racial Wealth Divide Project: http://www.RacialWealthDivide.org/ for a detailed history and analysis). These interlocking systems of institutional racism are largely invisible to the white community. Because our mainstream media consistently fail to provide the historical background of institutional racism, injustice and inequality, readers are left to supply their own explanations for present day racial disparities. Most frequently, unless they are given other information, readers of mainstream press fall back on the myth of the American Dream, where equal opportunity is available to all, regardless of race, class, and gender. Clearly the American Dream to own your own home still applies mostly to those privileged enough to benefit from institutions, such as the FHA, which were designed by white people for the benefit white people, at the expense of people of color.

On 12/18/06 a Boston Globe editorial reflected on the McCormack Diversity Study, declaring that “Race Still Matters” and that “hardly a day goes by without further evidence that skepticism from minorities is justified – in housing, jobs, income, education, incarceration rates, and many other indicators. The Boston Diversity Project can perform a considerable service if it triggers real remediation.” The Boston Globe could perform a considerable service if it insisted that its writers provide the historical landscape of present day inequality and injustice.

If you want to read the article “A ‘Smoking Gun’ on Race,” visit the Boston Globe online (http://www.boston.com/news/globe) and register an account to view all their articles on the web.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

"Race Still Matters" (12/18/06) Boston Globe Editorial on McCormack Diversity Study Takes a Crucial Step Forward But Needs to Go Further

“Race Still Matters” (12/18/06), Boston Globe Editorial on McCormack Diversity Study Takes a Crucial Step Forward But Needs to Go Further

The newly released (Dec 18, 2006) McCormack Diversity Study (UMass Boston) contains significant data on Black, White, Latino, and Asian experience in Boston. This data highlights important issues surrounding race in Boston including the disturbing but not surprising evidence that Blacks are more skeptical about institutional fairness in Massachusetts than whites. Reflecting on this study, the Boston Globe editorial (December 18, 2006) declares that “Race Still Matters” and that “hardly a day goes by without further evidence that skepticism from minorities is justified – in housing, jobs, income, education, incarceration rates, and many other indicators. " Given that it is usually very difficult for whites to see institutional racism, this Globe editorial has taken a crucial step forward by acknowledging that people of color suffer from structural racism in ways that do not fit the prototype image of personal discrimination based on race.

The Diversity Study gives evidence that over all, whites have significantly more confidence in the institutions under consideration (State & Local Governments, Police, Public Schools, News Media, Court System) than blacks. While in general, both whites and blacks lost confidence in these institutions between 1998 abd 2006, blacks had less confidence to begin with and lost more confidence than whites. A disturbing exception is confidence in the police, where whites actually gained confidence since 1998 while black confidence, lower to begin with, fell by 9 percentage points. The Globe editorial ignores this comparison data.

By comparing confidence in institutions between whites and people of color, the Diversity Study may be interpreted as suggesting that our institutions need to be understood from the perspective of a collective; thus implying that the good of the whole society is undercut if part of the society benefits more from the institutions that, in a healthy society, should benefit all fairly and justly. By ignoring the comparison data, the Globe obscures the perspective of society as a collective; it suggests that although disparities in institutional benefits penalize people of color, the well being of whites and people of color are separate, discrete, and unrelated. Our mainstream media need to make it clear that until our police act in ways that inspire equal confidence from all our neighborhoods and all our residents, no one is safe. Until all our institutions inspire robust confidence from all our residents, regardless of race, no one is treated fairly, and our society, as a collective, loses.

To read the McCormack Diversity Study, go to: http://www.umb.edu/news/2006news/releases/december/report_121406.pdf

If you want to read the December 18, 2006 Boston Globe editorial “Race Still Matters.” visit the Boston Globe online (http://www.boston.com/news/globe) and register an account to view all their articles on the web.

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Boston Globe Coverage of Healey"s "Soft on Crime" Attack on Patrick Misinforms Readers about CORI Again!

Boston Globe Coverage of Healey’s “Soft on Crime” Attack on Patrick Misinforms Readers about CORI Again!

The Sunday (9/24) front page Boston Globe story “Scrutiny of Criminals Heats up Race: Healey Presses Patrick on Background Checks” does readers a diservice by not providing accurate background information on the Criminal Offenders Record Information (CORI). This seems to be a pattern in the Boston Globe; I had the same complaint about the Boston Globe coverage of CORI Education Day in my posting dated Thursday May 4, 2006 on this blog. As I wrote then, the CORI was developed in the early ‘70’s to make criminal records available to police, prosecutors, probation officers, and judges. The current CORI laws contain regulations intended to protect the privacy and integrity of people with CORIs, including those with minor misdemeanors and cases where no conviction resulted. In the past 30 years and especially since 9/11 and the passage of the Patriot’s Act, this information has been made readily and widely available to potential employers, schools, landlords, etc. It has sometimes been misunderstood and misapplied. Currently 2.8 million people in Massachusetts have CORIs and 1.5 million new CORIs are produced per year affecting people of all races, ages, and backgrounds. Because their CORIs can be misunderstood or abused, many individuals are shut out of jobs, housing, entrance to college, loans, and other opportunities. Because our criminal justice system disproportionately affects men of color, misapplication of the CORI adds to the already high unemployment rate in communities of color and keeps many of those who have been accused of, or who have made and paid for mistakes in their past, from achieving the education, skills, and employment needed to change their lives.

Rather than providing an accurate history and background of the CORI legislation, the Globe lables all those with CORIs as “criminals try(ing) to re enter society…” This does not cover the variety of information contained in the CORI, including minor misdemeanors and no-convictions, nor how CORIs can be misunderstood and misapplied by potential employers, landlords, etc. The current controversy surrounding the CORI legislation is described in this story as “the fight to water down the CORI”. However, a careful reading of paragraphs 9-10 and 16-19 of the story idicates that the democratic candidate does not want to "water down" the CORI laws, but to make sure they are just and that they are fairly applied. The Globe should supply readers with accurate background and history of these controversial issues so voters can make their own informed and reasoned choices in the November election.

If you want to read the September 24, 2006 Boston Globe story “Scrutiny of Criminals Heats Up Race: Healey Presses Patrick on Background Checks,” visit the Boston Globe online (http://www.boston.com/news/globe) and register an account to view all their articles on the web.

Thursday, May 04, 2006

White Framework of Boston Globe Coverage of CORI Education Day Misses the Points

On April 20, 2006, a large rally was held on Boston Common and at the State House to educate legislators and the public on the Criminal Offenders Record Information (CORI) reform legislation. The CORI was developed in the early ‘70’s to make criminal records available to police, prosecutors, probation officers and judges. Buried in the CORI are regulations which protect the privacy and integrity of people with CORI’s regarding minor misdemeanors and cases where no conviction resulted. In the past 30 years and especially since 9/11 and the passage of the Patriot’s Act, this information has been made readily and widely available to potential employers, schools, landlords, etc, and it has been misunderstood, misused, and abused. Currently 2.8 million people in Massachusetts have CORIs and 1.5 million new CORIs are produced per year affecting thousands of people of all races, ages, and backgrounds, shutting them out of jobs, housing, entrance to college, loans, and other opportunities because of the misunderstanding and abuse of their CORIs. Because our criminal (in)justice system disproportionately affects men of color, abuse of the CORI is adding to the already high unemployment rate in communities of color and keeping those who have made -- and paid for – mistakes in their past from achieving the education, skills, and employment to change their lives. (go to
http://www.unionofminorityneighborhoods.org/marc/index.html for more information on CORI)

The Boston Globe coverage of CORI Education Day (“Controversy on Criminal Records Intensifies,” by Maria Cramer and Megan Tench, April 21, 2006), ignores this information which the rally was designed to disseminate. Furthermore, it overlooks the racist implications of the current CORI system by focusing exclusively on the controversy surrounding Bobby Dellelo. Mr Dellelo, a white man, now 64, pleaded guilty to manslaughter after his partner in a 1963 jewelry store robbery shot and killed a police detective. He was released in 2003 after serving 40 years; he has paid his debt to society and he deserves to be allowed to pursue his desire to become a paralegal. Instead, in addition to being deprived by his CORI of the opportunity for an education, he has become collateral damage in the white frame of this “news” story that makes invisible the racist impact of the CORI laws.

If you want to read the Globe story “Controversy on Criminal Records Intensifies,” visit the Boston Globe online (http://www.boston.com/news/globe) and register an account to view all their articles on the web.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Janet's comments on 12/2/05 Boston Globe column on youth gun violence

Boston Globe Column Tells Misleading Story on Solutions to Gun Violence among Urban Youth of Color

Although he never mentions the words “race,” or “black,” Brian McGrory writes disparagingly about crime prevention programs for urban youth of color in the opening lines of his column titled “Solution Lies Behind Bars” published in the Boston Globe, December 2, 2005:

“They can start all the midnight basketball leagues they want. They can have outreach programs until they’re blue in the face, create another 50,000 summer jobs in the mailroom of State Street Bank, allow ministers to pitch tents on city streets.”

For McGrory, the solution to the recent increase in urban youth gun violence is simple and one-dimensional:

“But there is nothing that will stop the senseless violence across this city quicker than the simplest solution of all: Put gun-toting punks in jail.”

McGrory makes the either-or argument that the decrease of youth gun violence in Boston in the 1990’s occurred because of police crackdowns rather than outreach programs:

“People like to talk about all the outreach in the 1990’s but most of the success was because authorities put criminals behind bars. This same coordination needs to happen again—immediately.”

* This story misrepresents the strategy developed in the early 1990’s by the BPD that combined tough and targeted law enforcement with innovative community-based programs. It was because this approach was multidimensional and cooperated with the communities it served that it was successful in reducing the youth homicide rate in the 1990’s.

* By suggesting that outreach programs do not work and that the only solution to our current crisis is to “put gun-toting punks in jail,” McGrory supports the stereotype held by many white people in Boston that urban youth of color are irredeemably prone to violence and that public safety in Dorchester, Mattapan, or Roxbury (the only neighborhoods he mentions in his column) can only be achieved through incarcerating youth of color.

* Unstated but underlying Mr. McGrory’s column is the assumption, strongly held by many white people, that the problem of urban youth gun violence is a black problem for which people of color only are accountable. This is, however, a complex, multi-racial problem for all Bostonians, and its solution must also address the growing problem of the lack of diversity in the Boston Police Department’s upper ranks and specialized units, a problem for which our white dominated criminal justice system is accountable. (see Diversity Gap Seen in Police Upper Ranks, (Boston Globe, November 17, 2005).

Read Brian McGrory's column on the Boston Globe website. You must register an account to view all their articles on the web.

Take action by writing the Boston Globe and letting them know what you think!

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Boston Globe Story Perpetuates Myth of Urban Youth and Damages State Senator

Janet's comments on Boston Globe story (November 11, 2005):
"DA HIRES SON OF SENATOR DESPITE HISTORY OF ARRESTS" by Suzanne Smalley

On November 11, 2005, the Boston Globe printed this story by staff member Suzanne Smalley in which she released the arrest record of Cornell Mills, son of state Senator Dianne Wilkerson. Senator Wilkerson is currently being sued by the state attorney general for alleged campaign finance violations. She is fighting the allegations and reports that she was denied a fair opportunity to respond to the concerns before the suit was filed. All of the charges brought against her son have been dismissed.

The November 24 edition of the Bay State Banner reports that the unauthorized leak of Cornell Mills arrest record in the Boston Globe story of November 11 is under investigation by the Boston Police Department and the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office as an abuse of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) laws. The Boston Globe has yet to report this investigation.

There are many things wrong with Nov 11 Globe story in addition to its use of an unauthorized leak. First of all, the police record of Cornell Mills has nothing to do with the charges currently being brought against Senator Wilkerson. Mr Mill's CORI is simply irrelevant to Senator Wilkerson's case. Although the story does state that none of Mr. Mills' arrests resulted in conviction, the detailing of Mr. Mills arrest record cannot help but damage Senator Wilkerson in the eyes of readers, particularly white readers who tend to put a black face on violence and who discredit the parents of urban youth with CORI's. Further, as evident in the title, the story suggests that District Attorney Daniel F. Conley hired Mr. Mills as a civilian investigator in his office's homicide unit because of political connections, again negatively implicating Senator Wilkerson with no supporting evidence. The story does quote Conley saying that he knew of Mills' record and decided that Mills deserved the job because of his numerous qualifications. However, the bulk of the story is devoted to outlining the details of Mr. Mills record and it ends with a quote from Eugene O'Donnell, a former New York City prosecutor and police officer saying "There's a 'what's wrong with this picture' aspect even when it's not a provable offense."

There is indeed a "what's wrong with this picture" aspect to this story, although it's not the one suggested by Mr. O'Donnell. It's the Globe's use of an unauthorized leak to perpetuate the predominantely white media's association of black urban youth with crime and by extension, to damage a respected African American state senator.

If you want to take action on this issue, write the Globe with your comments!

----

If you want to read the article these comments refer to, visit the Boston Globe website and register an account to view their articles on the web.

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Welcome

Welcome to the Greater Boston Anti-Racism Media Watch Blog. This blog has been created as an online activist tools to monitor and hold local media accountable for racist media representation and to analyze how white power and privilege frame media content.

This blog is a project of Community Change Inc. and the Action Coalition for Media Education, Greater Boston Chapter.